Reflecting on the last 10 years of SENDMarc EllisonSeptember 14, 2022Marking 25 years in nonclinical and 10 years with SEND, Marc reflects on how far the industry, and SEND itself, has come, and what lies ahead.
New standards on reviewMarc EllisonAugust 31, 2022New SEND standards are nearing publication, including updates for genetic toxicology, tumor combinations, and the much-anticipated SENDIG-DART v1.2.
Questioning my own SEND vocabularyMarc EllisonAugust 17, 2022This week’s reflections explore how the words we use, like “dataset” and “conversion”, can shape our understanding of SEND, sometimes in misleading ways.
The headache of clinical signsMarc EllisonAugust 3, 2022Can we standardize clinical signs data for cross-study analysis, or is the variability just too great? A bold new proposal sparks debate.
Still confused about the scope of SEND?Marc EllisonJuly 20, 2022Two years after the FDA clarified SEND requirements, questions still linger, especially for less-typical studies and how far customization can go.
Everyone is talking about it, but is anyone doing it?Marc EllisonJuly 6, 2022SEND and SDTM look strikingly similar, but are we truly leveraging their alignment to connect nonclinical and clinical insights?