Sensible SEND Blog

Regulatory SubmissionSENDSensible SEND

How good is good enough?

Marc Ellison

Some still believe that if a SEND submission passes the FDA’s Technical Rejection Criteria (TRC), that’s “good enough.” But this dangerously underestimates the role SEND plays in safeguarding first-in-human studies.

Regulatory SubmissionSENDSensible SEND

Go Together

Marc Ellison

Standards development can feel slow, but as SEND 3.2 shows, going together brings greater rigor, collaboration, and long-term value.

Regulatory SubmissionSENDSensible SEND

SENDIG-DART is more tricky than regular SEND

Marc Ellison

With the SENDIG-DART requirement fast approaching, key lessons from the FDA’s pilot highlight just how complex these studies can be, and why preparation matters.

Regulatory SubmissionSENDSensible SEND

Reflecting on the last 10 years of SEND

Marc Ellison

Marking 25 years in nonclinical and 10 years with SEND, Marc reflects on how far the industry, and SEND itself, has come, and what lies ahead.

Regulatory SubmissionSENDSensible SEND

New standards on review

Marc Ellison

New SEND standards are nearing publication, including updates for genetic toxicology, tumor combinations, and the much-anticipated SENDIG-DART v1.2.

Stay up to Date

Get expert tips, industry news, and fresh content delivered to your inbox.