Rigidity in a LIMS comes in two forms. Out-of-the-box systems are quick to deploy but force your laboratory to adapt to the software. Enterprise systems can be made to fit, but only through costly custom coding that is slow to deliver and hard to maintain through upgrades. Either way, staff time is lost to workarounds and new workflows or sites become harder to support. Join us to explore the top five pain points of a rigid LIMS, and how a configurable architecture can deliver the fit of a custom system without the cost and risk of custom code.
Register for our webinar on November 12th at 11am EST to learn how to solve:
- Poor workflow fit: off-the-shelf LIMS force you to change your processes; custom-coded systems fit only the original specification.
- Unexpected complexity: routine tasks need workarounds, spreadsheets, or a call to IT or the vendor.
- Implementation overruns: custom code runs over budget, and every upgrade risks breaking it.
- Limited room for growth: new methods and growing teams hit fixed limits or trigger another costly development project.
- Inconsistent fit across sites: what works at one site fails at others, forcing a choice between rigid standardization and a patchwork of customizations.
